What question should a fraud examiner ask to probe for additional details after an oral confession?

When probing for additional details after an oral confession, the question that stands out is one that invites the individual to provide specific information, which is what "What do you have left?" accomplishes. This question encourages the confession to elaborate on the specifics of their situation, particularly regarding any assets or remnants related to the fraudulent activity. It is open-ended and allows the interviewee the opportunity to offer more detailed insights into their circumstances following the confession.

By asking what they have left, the fraud examiner can gain valuable information about the extent of the fraudulent activities, any remaining assets, or even potential complications that might still exist as a result of the fraud. Such insights can be crucial for the investigation and may assist in understanding the full impact of the fraud.

The other options tend to be more closed or leading in nature, which can restrict the information that the subject may provide. For instance, questions that assume the state of their assets or finances, like "It's all gone, isn't it?" may elicit a defensive response rather than an informative one. By positioning the inquiry more neutrally, the examiner creates a conducive atmosphere for further disclosure.