When tracing financial transactions, what method uses the subject's records to analyze the relationship between their receipts and asset disposition?

The correct response highlights the direct method, which is specifically utilized for tracing financial transactions by examining a subject's records to establish a direct correlation between their receipts and how assets are managed or disposed of. In this approach, an investigator assesses transactions that are documented directly in the subject's records—such as income statements, invoices, or payment details—allowing for a clear understanding of where funds originate and how they are spent or invested.

This method provides a straightforward analysis of financial activities, making it easier to identify potential discrepancies or areas of concern, especially in cases of suspected fraud. By focusing on recorded transactions, the direct method helps create a transparent view of the subject's financial behavior, crucial for effective investigations into financial misconduct.

In practice, this contrasts with other methods such as the asset method, which focuses more on the subject's total assets and net worth rather than specific transactions. The bank records method typically zeroes in on bank statements to reconcile deposits and withdrawals but may not provide the comprehensive view of receipts and asset disposition that the direct method does. Meanwhile, the indirect method relies on establishing the financial position of a subject by inferring income and asset disposition from circumstantial evidence rather than direct transactions, which may be less clear.